Thursday, April 24, 2008

Mount And Blade Specs

Narration ...

The story of the statue of Our Lady of Sorrows has its origin in a lottery of Easter, where a municipal employee won the statue, and instead to take her home, prayerfully decided to give it to the City.

He turned to the man who so obviously second- -man, commanded the town of PaternĂ², namely, the Deputy Secretary Dr. F. Crisafi, who accepted this obvious considering its decision (see attached link).

The altar of Our Lady of Sorrows was then placed in the local input of the Town Hall a few days earlier on 07/05/2007.



Peter Galvan, the undersigned, being employed part-time and contract work at the UO . Police Station for the first three days of the week, Monday, May 7, entering the City to take up, I faced this altar with the statue above about 70cm in height. Being non-Catholic, it seemed strange to me, especially as the premises of the PM were literally plastered with images of Our Lady, Padre Pio, other saints, as well as an altar of St. Sebastian of about 190cm in height.

I was in doubt throughout the morning, then saw a group of municipal employees who took turns in reciting the prayers to the Virgin Mary statue and decided to act. I wrote a report to the Commander of service (04.07.2007, see attachment) pointing out the location of this statue in a public building open to the public is an explicit declaration of membership of the Public Administration to the Roman Catholic Church in violation of Constitutional that enshrine the right to freedom of religion, the principle of secularity of the state, and other constitutional provisions and laws that derive from them. Therefore considered it appropriate to remove the statue of Our Lady of Sorrows and the restoration of sites.

I did not have any feedback.

So on 16/05/2007 I sent a letter to the Mayor, the Director-General, to the dating of Labour, the Ombudsperson and the Commander PM in which, as citizens, workers and non-Catholic calls for the removal of statue of Our Lady of Sorrows, for the reasons mentioned above (see attachments). But this letter did not answer, at least not formally, in the sense that I began to suffer from acts of discrimination in the workplace. They started me with the atheist and the "Taliban", re-upholstered offices with pictures of Our Lady of Fatima, and one morning, and sign the attendance sheet service, isp four colleagues. PM "old" left me alone in the gatehouse of the column, saying that "smelled" pointing to me.


On 04/07/2007 I sent a second letter to all the above, repeating the violations represented by the altar in the City and denouncing acts of discrimination (see attachments), and, by remaining silent 's Municipal Administration of Paterno, on 14/09/2007 I sent a letter to the same subject (See attached) in which we asked about the administrative arrangements under which the altars were placed: the latter request was intended to comply L.241/1990, LR10/1991 and Presidential Decree 352, 06/27/1992 ( rules on access to administrative documents) not receiving an answer, I consulted a lawyer and have sued the City.

The case caused a sensation, so much so that told about the papers. In tribute to the Freedom of Religion and the Constitution the Republican mayor of Paterno's lawyer suggested to me by the press to request the transfer, colleagues and advisers are said to fall away, while Mr. Councillor for. Culture undertook to organize in communities made of Prayer agreement with a local priest (see attachments).

The legal case can be inferred from the documents attached thereto. We lost in the first instance, won the appeal and lost on appeal, with abstruse and contradictory judgments in which what is stated in law is denied by the facts.

reading acts, each draw their own conclusions by themselves.

As far as I'm concerned, I have the impression that the magistrates have wanted to circumvent the problem, dealing with theoretical aspects and leaving out the case.

The consequences of this aberrant behavior are: according to the latest public administration can do whatever he wants!

disengaged from any moral or legal obligation, not to mention constitutional religious symbols may require its employees EVEN WITHOUT AN ADMINISTRATIVE ACT.

For me, however, that have been isolated, discriminated against, I also suffered abuse and insults through the press, all normal for the judiciary, what I have now is simply the "annoyance" than any non-Catholic must endure passively in any Catholic country.

I wonder what would make me still a reality of the violation of the law: deportation to concentration camps?



0 comments:

Post a Comment